REVIEW PAPER
Foster care as an inherent part of the functioning of Neonatal Units - a single-center retrospective analysis of patients’ hospitalizations
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Neonatal Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2025-02-06
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-08-18
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-08-19
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-05-12
 
 
Publication date: 2026-05-12
 
 
Corresponding author
Agata Dominika Jankowska   

Department of Neonatal Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111, Szczecin, Poland
 
 
Pol. Ann. Med. 2026;33:91-95
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The number of children in foster care has been continuously growing. The waiting time for a foster family varies from weeks to months. One of the main factors causing prolongation of the process is the inadequate number of foster families.

Aim:
The aim of this study is to outline the problem of prolonged hospitalizations of newborns awaiting foster care placement

Material and methods:
We performed a retrospective analysis of medical and social data of newborns hospitalized in the Department of Neonatal Diseases of the Independent Public Clinical Hospital No. 2 in Szczecin. No ethics committee approval was required due to the retrospective and anonymized nature of the data.

Results and discussion:
Out of the 130 newborns requiring intervention, 61.5% were placed in foster care and 35.4% returned to their biological mothers. Nearly half were born preterm (46.2%), and over 60% of mothers did not receive adequate prenatal care. Substance use was noted during pregnancy in 51.5% of cases. In 2023, average hospital stay extended to 63,4 days. Legal delays, contributed to prolonged, non – medically indicated hospital stays.

Conclusions:
The Polish system requires hospitals to take responsibility for newborns until placement in foster care is available. There is a lack of additional institutions that can adequately care for children. Hospitals cannot be places for newborns to await for their legal status to be regulated and are unable to provide children with proper development and care during the neonatal period. Introduction of systemic changes is necessary to give newborn children a chance for development in a functional family.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Lichtenberg-Kokoszka E. Adoptive and foster parenting in the context of prenatal and perinatal life. Semin Sci Investig. 2019;40:145–155.
 
2.
Clutter L. Adult birth mothers who made open infant adoption placements after adolescent unplanned pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2014;43:190–199.
 
3.
Skalec-Ruczyńska A. The Scale of Violence as a Reason for Placing Children in Foster Care and the Role of Foster Carers in Overcoming Its Consequences. Abus Child Theory Res Pract. 2023;22:75–100.
 
4.
Sisson G. Who are the women who relinquish infants for adoption? Domestic adoption and contemporary birth motherhood in the United States. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022;54:46–53.
 
5.
Department of Labour, Social Affairs and Family of the Supreme Audit Office (NIK). Information on the Results of the Audit– Implementation of Tasks by Adoption Centres. Warsaw: Supreme Audit Office; KPS.430.007.2017. Nr ewid. 21/2018/P/17/044/KPS.
 
6.
Prusinowska-Marek A. Judicial Practice Regarding the Implementation of the Principle of Temporariness in Foster Care. Law in Action. 2019;40:43–78.
 
7.
Gajewska G. Caring for the Child Means Caring for the Caregivers. Foster Care and Adoption in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Comparison of Survey Results from 2021 and 2019. Pedagogical Yearbook. 2021;13:119–136.
 
8.
Whitt-Woosley A, Sprang G, Eslinger J. Foster care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative analysis of caregiver and professional experiences. Child Abuse Negl. 2022;124:105444.
 
9.
Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. Available from: https://familienportal.de/fami.... Accessed: March 22, 2026.
 
10.
Danecka M. Child safety above all: Foster care system in Germany. J Soc Policy. 2019;539:39–43.
 
11.
Hestbæk A-D, Höjer I, Pösö T, et al. Child welfare removal of infants: Exploring policies and principles for decision-making in Nordic countries. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;108:104572.
 
12.
Świątek M. Abandoned Children– Medical and Social Aspects. Gen Med Health Sci. 2020;26(2):174–179.
 
13.
Rao RP, et al. Impact of prenatal care on neonatal outcomes: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:482.
 
14.
Partridge S, Balayla J, Holcroft CA, Abenhaim HA. Inadequate prenatal care utilization and risks of infant mortality and poor birth outcomes: A retrospective analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:51.
 
15.
Kocherlakota P. Neonatal abstinence syndrome. Pediatrics. 2014;134(2):547–561.
 
16.
Hudak ML, Tan RC. Neonatal drug withdrawal. Pediatrics. 2012;129(2):540–560.
 
17.
Olsson TM, Sundell K. Foster care research in Sweden: A review. Psychosoc Interv. 2017;26(1):57–66.
 
18.
Zimmermann P. Child protection in Germany: Structures, processes and developments. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019;98:327–336.
 
19.
Kowalska M, Nowak A, Szymańska K. Emergency Pre-Adoption Centers in Poland – Needs and Possibilities. Pediatr Rev. 2021;50(1):22–28.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top