RESEARCH PAPER
Dr Google as the source of health information – the results of pilot qualitative study
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Anna Kłak   

Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02–097 Warsaw, Poland.
Submission date: 2016-06-22
Acceptance date: 2017-02-16
Online publication date: 2017-06-30
Publication date: 2019-12-20
 
Pol. Ann. Med. 2017;24(2):188–193
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Google is the most popular search engine that covers nearly 90% of the total online searches. It is likely to be used by both, patients and physicians to look for health information.

Aim:
The objective of the study was to find out deep motives for using the Internet to obtain health information.

Material and methods:
Anonymous study was carried out with the use of individual in-depth interviews (IDI). As many as 20 persons participated in the study (10 women and 10 men). The IDI scenario included the questions on health, the Internet as the source of health information and the credibility of information published online.

Results and discussion:
The majority of respondents (15 persons) admit that they sometimes search the Internet for health information because of curiosity, concern, and motivation to increase knowledge as well as broad and quick access to the network. The respondents search for useful information when the information provided by a physician and medical terms are incomprehensible or when the therapy prescribed by a physician is ineffective. For the majority of respondents Internet portals dedicated to one topic only are the most credible.

Conclusions:
Women search the Internet for health information more often than men and the scope of their search is broader. The Internet helps to shape basic knowledge, makes it possible to formulate questions asked to the physician and to understand the information provided by a physician.

 
REFERENCES (25)
1.
CBOS [Centre for Public Opinion Research]. Using the Internet 2014. Survey Summary. 2014;82. http://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL... [in Polish]. Accessed 20.05.2016.
 
2.
CBOS [Centre for Public Opinion Research]. Using the Internet 2015. Survey Summary. 2015;90. www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2015/K... [in Polish]. Accessed 20 May 2016.
 
3.
Pawłowska B, Zygo M, Potembska E, Kapka-Skrzypczak L, Dreher P, Ke˛dzierski Z. Prevalence of Internet addiction and risk of developing addiction as exemplified by a group of Polish adolescents from urban and rural areas. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(1):129–136.
 
4.
Polish Internet Research. [Online services of health: Content. Popularity. User profile. Searched information]. March 2011. http://pbi.org.pl/raporty/zdro... [in Polish]. Accessed 20 May 2016.
 
5.
Bujnowska-Fedak MM. Trends in the use of the Internet for health purposes in Poland. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:19410.1186/s12889-015-1473-3.
 
6.
Pew Research Center Internet, Science & Tech Health Online 2013. http://www. pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/hea.... Accessed 20.05.2016.
 
7.
Avery N, Ghandi J, Keating J. The ‘Dr Google' phenomenon–missed appendicitis. NZ Med J. 2012;125(1367):135–137.
 
8.
Brigo F, Erro R. Why do people google movement disorders? An infodemiological study of information seeking behaviors. Neurol Sci. 2016;37(5):781–787.
 
9.
Lee K, Hoti K, Hughes JD, et al. Consumer use of Dr Google: a survey on health information-seeking behaviors and navigational needs. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(12):e28810.2196/jmir.4345.
 
10.
Lee K, Hoti K, Hughes JD, et al. Dr Google and the consumer: a qualitative study exploring the navigational needs and online health information-seeking behaviors of consumers with chronic health conditions. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(12):e26210.2196/jmir.3706.
 
11.
Lam-Po-Tang J, McKay D. Dr Google, MD: a survey of mental health-related internet use in a private practice sample. Australas Psychiatry. 2010;18(2):130–133.
 
12.
Thackeray R, Crookston B, West JH. Correlates of health-related social media use among adults. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(1):e21.
 
13.
Hesse BW. The patient, the physician, and Dr. Google. Virtual Mentor. 2012;14(5):398–402.
 
14.
Pías-Peleteiro L, Cortés-Bordoy J, Martinón-Torres F. Dr. Google: what about the human papillomavirus vaccine? Hum VaccinImmunother. 2013;9(8):1712–1719.
 
15.
Anderson C. Presenting and evaluating qualitative research. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(8):141.
 
16.
Silverman D. The Interpretation of Qualitative Data. Warsaw: PWN; 2009 [in Polish].
 
17.
Baum F. Researching public health: behind the qualitative – quantitative methodological debate. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(4):459–468.
 
18.
Zakiya Q. Qualitative research and its uses in health care. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2008;1:11–19.
 
19.
Kruse CS, Bolton K, Freriks G. The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(2):e44.
 
20.
Carpenter DM, DeVellis RF, Hogan SL, Fisher EB, DeVellis BM, Jordan JM. Use and perceived credibility of medication information sources for patients with a rare illness: differences by gender. J Health Commun. 2011;16(6):629–642.
 
21.
Moretti FA, de Oliveira VE, de Silva EMK. Access to health information on the internet: a public health issue? Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2012;58(6):650–658.
 
22.
Duplaga M. The acceptance of e-Health solutions among patients with chronic respiratory conditions. Telemed. E-health. 2013;19(9):683–691.
 
23.
Bundorf MK, Wagner TH, Singer SJ, Baker LC. Who searches the internet for health information? Health Serv Res. 2006;41(3):819–836.
 
24.
Archambault PM. WikiBuild. A new application to support patient and health care professional involvement in the development of patient support tools. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e114.
 
25.
Del Giglio A, Abdala B, Ogawa C, et al. Quality of internet information available to patients on websites in Portuguese. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2012;58(6):645–649.