REVIEW PAPER
Effects of using lower limb exoskeleton on function and psychosocial well-being of stroke survivors: A review
 
More details
Hide details
1
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
 
2
Pantai Hospital Ayer Keroh, Malaysia
 
 
Submission date: 2025-03-20
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-07-13
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-07-26
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-05-20
 
 
Publication date: 2026-05-20
 
 
Corresponding author
Deepashini Harithasan   

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, 50300, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
 
 
Pol. Ann. Med. 2026;33:103-108
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Lower limb exoskeletons (LLEs) are a potential new development in assistive technology and rehabilitation that offer mechanical support and help people with lower limb limitations, such as stroke survivors. However, little is known about the effects of using an LLE on the overall lower limb functions and psychosocial well-being of stroke survivors.

Aim:
To summarise the effects of using an LLE on lower limb function, including mobility and functional independence in activities of daily living, as well as the psychosocial well-being among stroke survivors.

Material and methods:
The search for this review was conducted from January 2016 to February 2024 using the following databases: MEDLINE AND OVID, SCIENCE DIRECT, PROQUEST, and EBSCOhost. The following keywords were used are [(lower limb exoskeleton OR lower extremities exoskeleton OR robotic leg)] AND [(lower limb function OR lower extremities function OR leg function)] AND [(psychosocial wellbeing OR mental health OR psychological)] AND [(stroke survivors OR stroke patients)]. A total of 7 articles were included in the review.

Results and discussion:
The lower limb functions were measured using several assessment tools, such as the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremities, Barthel Index, Modified Barthel Index, Functional Ambulation Category, and Modified Rankin Scale. The psychosocial aspects were measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination, Stroke Impact Scale, and Stroke Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Improvements were observed in each paper, although some studies showed no significant difference.

Conclusions:
The use of the LLE in stroke survivors during interventions has been shown to positively affect lower limb functions and the psychosocial well-being of the user.
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Awad LN, Bae J, O’Donnell K, et al. A soft robotic exosuit improves walking in patients after stroke. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(400). https://doi.org/10.1126/scitra....
 
2.
Chua J, Culpan J, Menon E. Efficacy of an Electromechanical Gait Trainer Poststroke in Singapore: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(5):683–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr....
 
3.
Watanabe H, Marushima A, Kadone H, et al. Effects of Gait Treatment With a Single-Leg Hybrid Assistive Limb System After Acute Stroke: A Non-randomized Clinical Trial. Front Neurosci. 2020;13(January):1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.....
 
4.
Plaza A, Hernandez M, Puyuelo G, Garces E, Garcia E. Lower-limb medical and rehabilitation exoskeletons: A review of the current designs. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2021;16:278–291.
 
5.
Kim SJ, Lee HJ, Hwang SW, et al. Clinical characteristics of proper robot-assisted gait training group in non-ambulatory subacute stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2021;40(2):183–189. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.20....
 
6.
Korczyński B, Beata T. Polysomnography in patients with spinal cord injury who underwent robotic assisted gait training. Pol Ann Med. 2023;30(2):114–120. https://doi.org/10.29089/ paom/175360.
 
7.
Bannwart M, Rohland E, Easthope CA, Rauter G, Bolliger M. Robotic body weight support enables safe stair negotiation in compliance with basic locomotor principles. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984....
 
8.
Kim HY, Shin JH, Yang SP, Shin MA, Lee SH. Robot-assisted gait training for balance and lower extremity function in patients with infratentorial stroke: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):1–12.
 
9.
Mikolajczyk T, Ciobanu I, Badea DI, et al. Advanced technology for gait rehabilitation: An overview. Adv Mech Eng. 2018;10(7):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/168781....
 
10.
Morone G, Annicchiarico R, Iosa M, et al. Overground walking training with the i-Walker, arobotic servo-assistive device, enhances balance in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;13(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984....
 
11.
Louie DR, Mortenson WB, Durocher M, Teasell R, Yao J, Eng JJ. Exoskeleton for post-stroke recovery of ambulation (ExStRA): Study protocol for amixed-methods study investigating the efficacy and acceptance of an exo-skeleton-based physical therapy program during stroke in patient rehabilitation. BMC Neurol. 2019;20(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883....
 
12.
Baker R, Esquenazi A, Benedetti MG, Desloovere K. Gait analysis: Clinical facts. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;52(4):560–574.
 
13.
Jayaraman A, O’Brien MK, Madhavan S, et al. Stride management assist exoskeleton vs functional gait training in stroke: A randomized trial. Neurol. 2019;92(3):263–273. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.00....
 
14.
Erbil D, Tugba G, Murat TH, et al. Effects of robot-assisted gait training in chronic stroke patients treated by botulinum toxin-a: A pivotal study. Physiother Res Int. 2018;23(3):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.17....
 
15.
Bustamante Valles K, Montes S, Madrigal MDJ, Burciaga A, Martínez ME, Johnson MJ. Technology-assisted stroke rehabilitation in Mexico: A pilot randomized trial comparing traditional therapy to circuit training in a Robot/technology-assisted therapy gym. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984....
 
16.
Sung J, Choi S, Kim H, et al. Feasibility of rehabilitation training with a newly developed, portable, gait assistive robot for balance function in hemiplegic patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(2):178–187. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.20....
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top