CASE REPORT
Late compromise of the free fibula osteocutaneous flap and its sequela: a case report
More details
Hide details
1
Reconstructive Sciences Unit, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
Submission date: 2025-05-17
Final revision date: 2025-10-04
Acceptance date: 2025-10-04
Online publication date: 2025-12-18
Corresponding author
YiI Liu
Reconstructive Sciences Unit, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia. Tel.: +60178998768.
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Hematoma can adversely affect a flap in several ways, leading to flap compromise. The impact of hematoma on free flap is more complex than previously understood. Free flap compromise due to hematoma most commonly occurs during the early postoperative period.
Aim:
This article highlights the late compromise of the free fibula flap and the significance of flap monitoring after a secondary procedure.
Case study:
We present a case of late free fibula osteocutaneous flap compromise on postoperative day 13 due to hematoma. A 21-year-old woman with left tibia osteofibrous dysplasia underwent wide resection and left tibia reconstruction using the modified Capanna technique. Postoperatively, she developed a deep surgical site infection with implant exposure, secondary to partial thickness necrosis of the skin paddle caused by hematoma-induced ischemia-reperfusion injury. She was treated with antibiotics, dressings, and debridement. Implant removal was performed at postoperative month 5 following bone union.
Results and discussion:
Hematoma can exert pressure on surrounding tissues, leading to vascular pedicle compression and thrombosis. The time dependency of flap salvage rates is associated with the progression of irreversible ischemia-reperfusion injury. Complications such as surgical site infection with implant exposure may occur. Data on timing of implant removal remain limited. Conventional management involves debridement, antibiotics, and hardware removal. The implant may be preserved until bony healing is achieved, provided there is no implant failure, prolonged exposure, or active infection.
Conclusions:
Early recognition and prompt re-exploration are crucial for flap salvageability in the presence of hematoma. The removal of an exposed implant is controversial, as clear guidelines are still lacking.
FUNDING
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
REFERENCES (6)
1.
Jayaramaraju D, Venkataramani H, Rajasekaran RB, Agraharam D, Sabapathy SR, Rajasekaran S. Modified Capanna’s technique (vascularized free fibula combined with allograft) as a single-stage procedure in post-traumatic long-segment defects of the lower end of the femur: outcome analysis of a series of 19 patients with an average gap of 14 cm. Indian J Plast Surg. 2019;52(3):296–303.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039....
2.
Ahmad FI, Gerecci D, Gonzalez JD, Peck JJ, Wax MK. The role of postoperative hematoma on free flap compromise. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(8):1811–1815.
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.2....
3.
Fang F, Lin CH. Lower extremity reconstruction. In: Wei FC, Mardini S. Flaps and Reconstructive Surgery. Elsevier. 2009:255–274.
4.
Haseeb M, Butt MF, Altaf T, Muzaffar K, Gupta A, Jallu A. Indications of implant removal: a study of 83 cases. Int J Health Sci. 2017;11(1):1–7.
5.
Manas N, Michael VD, and Karen KE. Perioperative care and rehabilitation specific to the lower limb. In: Hong JP, Hallock GG. Lower extremity reconstruction: a practical guide. 2021:253.
https://doi.org/10.1055/b00000....
6.
Yudistira A, Asmiragani S, Imran AW, Sugiarto MA. Surgical site infection management following spinal instrumentation surgery: implant removal vs. implant retention: an updated systematical review. Acta Inform Med. 2022;30(2):115–1220.
https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.20....