Application of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy for cancer patients: A case study

Anna Trznadel; Paweł Grzybek

doi:10.1016/j.poamed.2016.11.009

2/2017 vol. 24

Get citation

CASE REPORT

Application of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy for cancer patients: A case study

Anna Trznadel ¹

, Paweł Grzybek ^{2, 3}

More details

Hide details

1	Senior Club, Municipal Family Assistance Center in Kielce, Poland
2	Outpatient Psychological Assistance, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland
3	Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology, Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Jan Kochanowski, Kielce, Poland

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR

Anna Trznadel

Senior Club, Municipal Family Assistance Center in Kielce, Naruszewicza 23, 25-628 Kielce, Poland. Tel.: +48 666 011 198; Fax: (41) 368 50 57.

Submission date: 2016-02-02

Acceptance date: 2016-11-14

Online publication date: 2017-03-09

Publication date: 2020-03-22

Pol. Ann. Med. 2017;24(2):228–231

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poamed.2016.11.009

Article (PDF)

References (14)

KEYWORDS

ABSTRACT

Introduction:
The increase in cancer incidence and mortality calls for a search of effective methods to improve patient's quality of life and well-being.

Aim:
The aim of this article is to present a case study that examined the application of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy for a cancer patient.

Case study:
The patient (Mrs B) was diagnosed with malignant neoplasm of the breast; and during her stay at Holycross Cancer Centre she decided to undergo EMDR therapy in order to deal with pre-existing feelings of helplessness and anxiety. She attended three 90-min sessions, all performed according to the EMDR therapy standard protocol. Furthermore, Mrs B's level of distress was measured using the distress thermometer and she filled in a problem checklist before and after the treatment. The target event, the worst image as well as positive and negative cognition were identified. Also, the validity of cognition (VOC) and subjective units of disturbance were measured before and after the therapy. Furthermore, the patient reported negative body sensations. Then, desensitization phase followed.

Results:
The results of the therapy were: significantly lower level of distress and less problems reported. The patient did not feel any negative emotions or physical sensations and her VOC increased too.

Discussion:
The results are discussed in relation to other studies and future directions for the research are suggested.

Conclusions:
This case suggests possible advantages of EMDR therapy, demonstrating an improvement in patient's well-being in a short time.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

REFERENCES (14)

International Agency for Research on Cancer. World Health Organization. Latest world cancer statistics. Global cancer burden rises to 14.1 million new cases in 2012: marked increase in breast cancers must be addressed. Press Release. 2013;223:1–3.

Google Scholar

Guzińska K, Dziedziul J, Rudnik A. Psychological conditions of the quality of life of patients undergoing radiotherapy with regard to the stage of the disease and age. Psychoonkologia. 2014;18(2):51–58 [in Polish].

Google Scholar

Shapiro F. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR): Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2001.

Google Scholar

Friedberg F. Eye movement desensitization in fibromyalgia: a pilot study. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery. 2004;10(4):245–249.

Google Scholar

Castelli Gattinara P. Working with EMDR in chronic incapacitating diseases: the experience of a Neuromuscular Diseases Center. J EMDR Pract Res. 2009;3(3):169–177.

Google Scholar

Wilensky M. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) as a treatment for phantom limb pain. J Brief Ther. 2006;5(1):31–44.

Google Scholar

Brennstuhl MJ, Tarquinio C, Montel S, Masson J, Bassan F, Tarquinio P. Using eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) as a treatment for phantom breast syndrome: case study. Sexologies. 2015;24(2):29–36.

Google Scholar

Olędzka M, Gryglewicz A, Zaborowska-Sapeta K, Grzybek P, Kiebzak W. The eye movement desensitization and reprocessing approach in pain management – a case report of a patient with paraparesis. Pol Ann Med. 2016;23(1):30–33.

Google Scholar

Capezzani L, Ostacoli L, Cavallo M, et al. EMDR and CBT for cancer patients: comparative study of effects on PTSD, anxiety, and depression. J EMDR Pract Res. 2013;7(3):134–143.

Google Scholar

10.

World Health Organisation. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Geneva: WHO; 2016.

Google Scholar

11.

Życińska J, Wojtyna E, Heyda A, Syska-Bielak A. Distress Thermometer. Polish adaptation with the agreement of American Cancer Society; 2008 [in Polish] www.ptpo.org.pl/index/images/s....

Google Scholar

12.

Denaro N, Tomasello L, Grazioso Russi E. Cancer and stress: what's matter? From epidemiology: the psychologist and oncologist point of view. J Cancer Ther Res. 2014;6(3):1–11.

Google Scholar

13.

Koch L, Jansen L, Brenner H, Arndt V. Fear of recurrence and disease progression in long-term (≥5 years) cancer survivors – a systematic review of quantitative studies. Psychooncology. 2013;22(1):1–11.

Google Scholar

14.

Kiebzak W, Kowalski IM, Domagalska M, et al. Assessment of visual perception in adolescents with a history of central coordination disorder in early life – 15-year follow-up study. Arch Med Sci. 2012;8(5):879–885.