Current issue
Journal content
Articles in press
Archive
About the Journal
About the Polish Annals of Medicine
Editorial Board
Open Access policy
Abstracting & indexing
Affiliated institutions
Contact
Instructions
Peer review process
Guide for authors
Publication ethics
Ethics and Patient Consent
User License
Usage of third party materials
Disclaimer
Reviewers
Guide for reviewers
List of reviewers
Review Form
RESEARCH PAPER
Generational transfer of psychological resilience
| 1 | Chair and Clinic of Rehabilitation of Children and Adolescents, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland |
| 2 | Provincial Complex of Psychiatric Health in Olsztyn, Poland |
| 3 | Department of General Surgery, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, United Kingdom |
| 4 | Chair of Developmental Psychology and Education, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Warsaw, Poland |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Piotr M. Kowalski
Ysbyty Gwynedd General Surgery, Penrhosgarnedd, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2PW, United Kingdom. Tel.: +48 508 110 789.
Ysbyty Gwynedd General Surgery, Penrhosgarnedd, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2PW, United Kingdom. Tel.: +48 508 110 789.
Submission date: 2016-01-25
Acceptance date: 2016-02-19
Online publication date: 2016-03-15
Publication date: 2020-03-24
Pol. Ann. Med. 2016;23(2):102–107
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Review of literature on psychological resilience reveals interest in this subject area among representatives of biological and social sciences, as well as humanities. While explorers of human psychological reality search for the cause and effect relationship, the semantic area of this notion keeps evolving and it expands conceptualization of the definition.
Aim:
To establish the generational transmission of psychological resilience/buoyancy and basic hope in the family system.
Material and methods:
The Psychological Resilience Questionnaire (PRQ) was used in the study drawn by Trzebiński and Zięba. The study participants included 106 people, 32 families, students (N = 35) and their parents (N = 70). The age range within the group of students was from 19 to 29 years, within the group of parents it ranged from 30 to 50 years and over. There were 54 men and 52 women in total. The subjects were recruited from the Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship, and they were studying on various courses.
Results and discussion:
A correlation analysis and a hierarchical regression analysis were made. The following results were obtained: there was a positive correlation between psychological resilience and basic and there was also a positive correlation between the order of birth and psychological resilience. The obtained data indicate significance of generational transmission in the family system.
Conclusions:
Interaction of relations within a family system encourages initiation of cognitive curiosity and exploration of discussed problems within the field of psychological resilience and basic hope.
Review of literature on psychological resilience reveals interest in this subject area among representatives of biological and social sciences, as well as humanities. While explorers of human psychological reality search for the cause and effect relationship, the semantic area of this notion keeps evolving and it expands conceptualization of the definition.
Aim:
To establish the generational transmission of psychological resilience/buoyancy and basic hope in the family system.
Material and methods:
The Psychological Resilience Questionnaire (PRQ) was used in the study drawn by Trzebiński and Zięba. The study participants included 106 people, 32 families, students (N = 35) and their parents (N = 70). The age range within the group of students was from 19 to 29 years, within the group of parents it ranged from 30 to 50 years and over. There were 54 men and 52 women in total. The subjects were recruited from the Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship, and they were studying on various courses.
Results and discussion:
A correlation analysis and a hierarchical regression analysis were made. The following results were obtained: there was a positive correlation between psychological resilience and basic and there was also a positive correlation between the order of birth and psychological resilience. The obtained data indicate significance of generational transmission in the family system.
Conclusions:
Interaction of relations within a family system encourages initiation of cognitive curiosity and exploration of discussed problems within the field of psychological resilience and basic hope.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None declared.
REFERENCES (33)
2.
Kolar K. Resilience: revisiting the concept and its utility for social research. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2011;9(4):421–433.
3.
Masten AS, Obradović J. Competence and resilience in development. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1094:13–27.
4.
Oleś M. [The Quality of Life of Young People in Health and Disease]. Lublin: KUL; 2010 [in Polish].
5.
Block JH, Block J, The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior.Collins WA, ed. Development of Cognition Affect and Social Relations: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology. 13. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1980:39–101.
6.
Block JH, Kremen AM. IQ and ego – resiliency: conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70(2):349–361.
7.
Ogińska-Bulik N, Juczyński Z. Resiliency in children and adolescents: characteristic and measurement – Polish scale SPP 18. PFP. 2011;16(1):7–28 [in Polish].
9.
Fredrickson B. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol. 2001;56:218–226.
10.
Ogińska-Bulik N, Juczyński Z. [Resilience measurement scale SPP-25]. Nowiny Psychol. 2008;3:39–56 [in Polish].
11.
Rossi N, Bisconti T, Bergeman CS. The role of dispositional resilience in regaining life satisfaction after the loss of spouse. Death Stud. 2007;31(10):863–883.
12.
Sęk H, Kaczmarek Ł, Ziarko M, Pietrzykowska E, Lewicka J. Resiliency and well-being in chronic diseases – mediating role of empowerment and coping. PFP. 2012;17(2):327–343 [in Polish].
13.
Tugade M, Fredrickson B. Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004;86(2):320–333.
14.
Horton T, Wallander J. Hope and social support as resilience factors against psychological distress of mothers who care for children with chronic physical conditions. Rehab Psychol. 2001;46(4):382–399.
15.
Trzebiński J, Zięba M. [Basic Hope Inventory BHI-12]. Warsaw: Pracowania Testów Psychologicznych PTP; 2003 [in Polish].
16.
Erikson EH. The life cycle: epigenesis of identity. In: Fitzgerald H, ed. Developmental Psychology. New York: W.W. Norton-London & Company; 1970:46–81.
17.
Snyder CR, Harris C, Anderson JR, et al. The will and the ways: development and validation of an individualdifferences measure of hope. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;60:570–585.
18.
Kaczmarek Ł. [Psychological Resilience Questionnaire – Polish adaptation of Ego Resiliency Scale]. Czas Psychol. 2011;2 [in Polish].
19.
Trzebiński J, Zięba M. Basic hope as a world-view: an outline of a concept. Pol Psychol Bull. 2004;2:171–182.
20.
Ogińska-Bulik N, Juczyński Z. Resiliency as a determinant of positive and negative consequences experienced traumatic situation. PFP. 2012;17(2):395–410 [in Polish].
21.
Rutter M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1987;57(3):316–331.
22.
Trzebiński J, Zięba M. Hope, loss and personal growth. PJZ. 2003;2(1) [in Polish].
23.
Lamb ME, Lewis C. The development and significance of father–child relationships in two-parent families. In: Lamb ME, ed. The Role of the Father in Child Development. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2004:273–306.
24.
Appl DJ, Brown S, Stone M. A fathers interactions with his toddler: personal and professional lessons for early childhood educators. ECEJ. 2008;36:127–134.
25.
Ginsberg BG. Parent–Adolescent Relationship Program (PARD): relationship enhancement therapy with adolescents and their families (fathers and sons). Psychotherapy. 1995;35(1):108–112.
26.
Waller MA. Resilience in ecosystemic context. Evaluation of the concept. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2001;71(3):290–297.
27.
Kilmer RP, Tedeshi RG. Assessing strengths, resilience, and growth to guide clinical interventions. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2005;36(3):230–237.
28.
Maccoby EE. The role of parents in the socialization of children: an historical overview. Dev Psychol. 1992;28(6):1006–1017.
29.
Ju-Hyun S, Volling BL. Coparenting and children's temperament predict firstborns' cooperation in the care of an infant sibling. J Fam Psychol. 2015;29(1):130–135.
30.
Mercer RT, Ferketich S, May K, DeJoseph J, Sollid D. Further exploration of maternal and paternal attachment. Res Nurs Health. 1988;11(2):83–95.
31.
Semmer N. Personality, stress and coping. In: Vollrath M, ed. Handbook of Personality and Health. Chichester: Wiley; 2006:73–113.
32.
Johnson DR, Amoloza TO, Booth A. Stability and developmental change in marital quality: a three-wave panel analysis. J Marriage Fam. 1992;54:582–594.
33.
Plopa M. [Experiencing intimacy and marital satisfaction]. Małżeństwo Rodzina. 2002;3(3) [in Polish].
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.