RESEARCH PAPER
Is there any coexistence of sacroiliac joints dysfunction with dysfunctions of occipito-atlanto-axial complex? Part II: The biomechanical aspect
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Medical University of Łódź, Poland
 
2
The Dr. Z. Radliński Provincial Centre of Orthopaedics and Locomotor System Rehabilitation in Łódź, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2011-05-24
 
 
Acceptance date: 2011-12-01
 
 
Publication date: 2020-04-10
 
 
Corresponding author
Tomasz Adamczewski   

Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Medical University of Łódź, The Dr Z. Radliński Provincial Centre of Orthopaedics and Locomotor System Rehabilitation, Drewnowska 75, 91-002 Łódź, Poland. Tel.: +4842 253 71 77, +4842 253 71 42, +48 505 941 857.
 
 
Pol. Ann. Med. 2012;19(1):38–42
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
As the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) join two kinematic chains, the pelvis and the vertebral column, their functional disorders cause secondary changes in the musculoskeletal system. Other reasons concerning a connection between its distant parts are tensegrity principles that govern tension distribution in tendons, muscles, fasciae and ligaments. Our hypothesis was that due to a biomechanical connection between SIJ and cervico-cephalic joints (CCJ), dysfunctions in the SIJ can determine dysfunctions in the CCJ.

Aim:
The aim of this study was to assess various types of SIJ dysfunctions (ilio-sacral and sacro-iliac) and their possible coexistence with CCJ dysfunctions.

Material and methods:
The study group comprised 80 patients with low back pain, 40 of whom were diagnosed with SIJ dysfunctions. The examination of the suboccipital region by Kaltenborn and Evjenth was conducted by a researcher who was unaware of the results of the pelvis examination. StatGraphics Centurion XV was employed for data analysis.

Results and discussion:
CCJ dysfunctions were detected in almost all subjects. There was a statistically significant difference in mobility and in gliding of the C0–C1 segment between both groups. The restricted mobility on the left side of the C0–C1 segment was statistically significant. The detected abnormal stability on the right side of the C1 motion segment in the study group did not correlate with the side of the SIJ dysfunction.

Conclusions:
There was no dominant dysfunction of the SIJ. The prevalence of dysfunctions of the upper cervical motion segments was high in the study group. There was a tendency towards larger numbers of dysfunctions concerning the right CCJ than the left one observed in patients with SIJ dysfunctions.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None declared
 
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Ackermann WP. Chiropraktyka ukierunkowana. Diagnoza i technika [Directed Chiropractic. Diagnosis and techniques]. Poznań: Natura Medica. 2000;26–27,47–50.
 
2.
Bochenek A, Reicher M. Anatomia człowieka. Tom 1 [Human anatomy. Vol. 1]. Warszawa: PZWL. 2006;1:257–261.
 
3.
Claus AP, Hides JA, Moseley GL, Hodges PW. Different ways to balance the spine: subtle changes in sagittal spinal curves affect regional muscle activity. Spine. 2009;34(6):208–214.
 
4.
Forst SL, Wheeler MT, Fortin JD, Vilensky JA. The sacroiliac joint: anatomy, physiology and clinical significance. Pain Physician. 2006;9(1):61–67.
 
5.
Ge W, Pickar JG. Time course for the development of muscle history in lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles arising from changes in vertebral position. Spine. 2008;8(2):320–328.
 
6.
Gnat R, Saulicz E, Biały M, Kłaptocz P. Does pelvic asymmetry always mean pathology? Analysis of mechanical factors leading to the asymmetry. J Hum Kinem. 2009;21:23–35.
 
7.
Greenman PE. Innominate shear dysfunction. J Manual Med. 1986;4:176–178.
 
8.
Greenman PE. In: Principles of Manual Medicine. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003; 510–537.
 
9.
Hack GD, Koritzer RT, Robinson WL, Hallgren RC, Greenman PE. Anatomic relation between the rectus capitis posterior minor muscle and the dura mater. Spine. 1997;22(8):924–926.
 
10.
Kaltenborn F. Kręosłup: badanie manualne i mobilizacja [The spinal column: manual examination and mobilization]. Toruń: Rolewski; 1989:306–318.
 
11.
Lephart SM, Henry TJ. Proprioception and neuromuscular control in joint stability. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2000.
 
12.
Moseley GL, Hodges PW, Gandevia SC. Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus muscle are differentially active during voluntary arm movements. Spine. 2002;2:29–36.
 
13.
O’Sullivan PB, Beales DJ. Diagnosis and classification of pelvic girdle pain disorders. Part 1: a mechanism based approach within a biopsychosocial framework. Man Ther. 2007;12(2):86–97.
 
14.
Poley RE, Borchers JR. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: evaluation and treatment. Phys Sports Med. 2008;36(1):42–49.
 
15.
Saulicz E, Nowotny J, Cieśla T, Polak A. Zmiany ciężarowego zrównoważenia ciała w nasępstwie biernych mobilizacji stawów krzyżowo-biodrowych [The influence of passive sacroiliac joint mobilization on changes in load body balance]. Fizjoter Pol. 1996;4:76–78.
 
16.
Saulicz E, Nowotny J, Kokosz M, Saulicz M. Efektywność korekcji w płaszczyźnie horyzontalnej w następstwie biernych mobilizacji stawów krzyżowo-biodrowych [The influence of passive sacroiliac joint mobilization effectiveness of correction in the transverse plane]. Fizjoter Pol. 1996;4:79–82.
 
17.
Saulicz E, Nowotny J. Rola biernej korekcji miednicy w zachowawczym leczeniu bocznych skrzywień kręgosłupa [The role of passive correction of the pelvis in the conservative treatment of lateral spinal curvatures]. Fizjoter Pol. 1996;4:64–68.
 
18.
Saulicz E, Nowotny J, Saulicz M. Skuteczność postępowania korekcyjnego wzbogaconego mobilizacjami stawów krzyżowo-biodrowych [Effectiveness of corrective procedures with mobilization of the sacroiliac joint]. Fizjoter Pol. 1996;4:59–63.
 
19.
Snijders CJ, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R, Mens JMA, Kleinrensik GJ. Biomechanics of the interface between spine and pelvis in different postures. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Dorman T, eds. Movement, Stability and Low Back Pain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1997; 103–113.
 
20.
Snijders CJ, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R. Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs. Biomechanics of self-bracing of the sacroiliac joints and its significance for treatment and exercise. Clin Biomech. 1993;8:285–294.
 
21.
Vleeming A, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Hammudoghlu D, Stoeckart R, Snijders CJ, Mens JM. The function of the long dorsal sacroiliac ligament: its implication for understanding low back pain. Spine. 1996;21(5):556–562.
 
22.
Vleeming A, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Stoeckart R, van Wingerden JP, Snijders CJ. The posterior layer of the thoracolum-bar fascia. Its function in load transfer from spine to legs. Spine. 1995;20(7):753–758.
 
23.
Vleeming A, Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R, Mens JMA. The role of the sacroiliac joints in coupling between spine, pelvis, legs and arms. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Dorman T, eds. Movement, Stability and Low Back Pain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1997: 53–71.
 
24.
Zaborowska-Sapeta K, Kowalski IM, Protasiewicz-Fałdowska H, Wolska O. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Chêneau brace treatment for idiopatic scoliosis – own observations. Pol Ann Med. 2010;17(1):44–53.