Current issue
Journal content
Articles in press
Archive
About the Journal
About the Polish Annals of Medicine
Editorial Board
Open Access policy
Abstracting & indexing
Affiliated institutions
Contact
Instructions
Peer review process
Guide for authors
Publication ethics
Ethics and Patient Consent
User License
Usage of third party materials
Disclaimer
Reviewers
Guide for reviewers
List of reviewers
Review Form
RESEARCH PAPER
The analysis of the empathy factor in students of medical sciences
| 1 | Department of Social Medicine and Social Pathology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Polnad |
| 2 | Heritage Care, United Kingdom |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Krzysztof Sobczak
Department of Social Medicine and Social Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences with Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Tuwima 15, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland. Tel.: +48 349 15 53.
Department of Social Medicine and Social Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences with Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Tuwima 15, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland. Tel.: +48 349 15 53.
Submission date: 2018-12-12
Final revision date: 2019-07-14
Acceptance date: 2019-07-15
Online publication date: 2019-12-11
Pol. Ann. Med. 2019;26(2):145–150
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Many research projects identify empathy as one of the most important factors necessary for efficient cooperation with patients. For that reason, nowadays, students of medical schools are more often offered access to training, which helps them to develop empathic communication.
Aim:
The aim of our research was to compare empathy scores of students of medical sciences in Poland against those of students from outside of our system of education.
Material and methods:
In our study, the sample included 536 students from the Medical University of Gdańsk. The participants filled in Baron–Cohen’s Empathy Quotient (EQ) – 40 questionnaire and another one, concerning data on demographics. To analyse dependence between discrete variables and statistical heterogeneity of groups, we applied Pearson’s χ2 test and analysis of variance.
Results and discussion:
The results revealed a correlation between female sex and the value of empathy score (χ2 = 86.781, df = 55, P = 0.004). Female students of nursing and obstetrics had the highest average empathy score (EQ = 49.3), which was followed by the students of physiotherapy (EQ = 47.1). Male students of pharmacy had the lowest score (EQ = 44).
Conclusions:
The findings of our study confirm a connection between sex and level of empathy. Majority of students of those specialisations we researched (61%) had an average level of empathy (class II EQ = 33–51). We did not reveal dependence between the year or the mode of study and the EQ.
Many research projects identify empathy as one of the most important factors necessary for efficient cooperation with patients. For that reason, nowadays, students of medical schools are more often offered access to training, which helps them to develop empathic communication.
Aim:
The aim of our research was to compare empathy scores of students of medical sciences in Poland against those of students from outside of our system of education.
Material and methods:
In our study, the sample included 536 students from the Medical University of Gdańsk. The participants filled in Baron–Cohen’s Empathy Quotient (EQ) – 40 questionnaire and another one, concerning data on demographics. To analyse dependence between discrete variables and statistical heterogeneity of groups, we applied Pearson’s χ2 test and analysis of variance.
Results and discussion:
The results revealed a correlation between female sex and the value of empathy score (χ2 = 86.781, df = 55, P = 0.004). Female students of nursing and obstetrics had the highest average empathy score (EQ = 49.3), which was followed by the students of physiotherapy (EQ = 47.1). Male students of pharmacy had the lowest score (EQ = 44).
Conclusions:
The findings of our study confirm a connection between sex and level of empathy. Majority of students of those specialisations we researched (61%) had an average level of empathy (class II EQ = 33–51). We did not reveal dependence between the year or the mode of study and the EQ.
FUNDING
Studies have not been supported by institutions or individuals.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
O’Sullivan DM, Moran J, Corcoran P, O’Flynn S, O’Tuathaigh C, O’Sullivan AM. Medical school selection criteria as predictors of medical student empathy: a cross-sectional study of medical students, BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjo....
2.
Squier RW. A model of empathic understanding and adherence to treatment regimens in practitioner-patient relationships. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(3):325–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9....
3.
Yang N, Xiao H, Cao Y, Li S, Yan H, Wang Y. Influence of oncology nurses’ empathy on lung cancer patients’ cellular immunity. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018;11:279–287. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S....
4.
Riess H. The science of empathy. J Patient Exp. 2017;4(2):74–77. https://doi:10.1177/2374373517....
5.
Pedersen R. Empirical research on empathy in medicine – A critical review. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76(3):307–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.....
6.
Riess H, Kelley JM, Bailey R, Konowitz PM, Gray ST. Improving empathy and relational skills in otolaryngology residents: a pilot study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(1):120–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459....
7.
Hojat M. Assessments of empathy in medical school admissions: what additional evidence is needed? Int J Med Educ. 2014;5:7–10. https://dx.doi.org/10.5116%2Fi....
8.
Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S. The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. J Autism Dev Disord. 2004;34(2):163–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd....
9.
Jankowiak-Siuda K, Kantor-Martynuska J, Siwy-Hudowska A, et al. Psychometric properties of the Polish adaptation of short form of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short). Psychiatr Pol. 2017;51(4):719–734 [in English and Polish]. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/64....
10.
Baron-Cohen S. Zero Degrees of Empathy. Sopot: Smak Słowa; 2015 [Polish translation].
11.
Hojat M, Erdmann JB, Gonnella JS. Personality assessments and outcomes in medical education and the practice of medicine: AMEE Guide No. 79. Med Teach. 2013;35(7):1267–1301. https://doi.org/10.3109/014215....
12.
Price A, Dambha-Miller H. Empathy as a state beyond feeling: a patient and clinician perspective. J R Soc Med. 2019;112(2):57–60. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0141....
13.
Adler RB, Rosenfeld LB, Proctor RF. Interplay: the process of interpersonal communication. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.
14.
Stryjski R, Stryjski A. The doctors’ systems of training in the selected european countries (unitary or two-cycle medical studies?). Probl Profes. 2016;2:83–96 [in Polish].
15.
Bratek A, Bulska W, Bonk M, Seweryn M, Krysta K. Empathy among physicians, medical students and candidates. Psychiatr Danub. 2015;27 (Suppl 1):48–52.
16.
Abe K, Niwa M, Fujisaki K, Suzuki Y. Associations between emotional intelligence, empathy and personality in Japanese medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909....
17.
Bangash AS, Ali NF, Shehzad AH, Haqqi S. Maintenance of empathy levels among first and final year medical students: a cross sectional study. F1000Res. 2013;2:157. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000....
18.
Khademalhosseini M, Khademalhosseini Z, Mahmoodian F. Comparison of empathy score among medical students in both basic and clinical levels. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2014;2(2):88–91.
19.
Mostafa A, Hoque R, Mostafa M, Rana MM, Mostafa F. Empathy in undergraduate medical students of bangladesh: psychometric analysis and differences by gender, academic year, and specialty preferences. ISRN Psychiatry. 2014;2014:375439. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/3....
20.
Pawełczyk A, Pawełczyk T, Bilecki J. Medical students’ empathy and their career preference. Psychiatr Psychol Klin. 2007;7(3):138–143 [in English and Polish].
21.
Santos MA, Grosseman S, Morelli TC, Giuliano IC, Erdmann TR. Empathy differences by gender and specialty preference in medical students: a study in Brazil. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:149–153. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5....
22.
Tariq N, Rasheed T, Tavakol M. A quantitative study of empathy in Pakistani medical students: A multicentered approach. J Prim Care Community Health. 2017;8(4):294–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/215013....
23.
Groen Y, Fuermaier AB, Den Heijer AE, Tucha O, Althaus M. The empathy and systemizing quotient: The psychometric properties of the Dutch version and a review of the cross-cultural stability. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45(9):2848–2864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803....
24.
Bertram K, Randazzo J, Alabi N, Levenson J, Doucette JT, Barbosa P. Strong correlations between empathy, emotional intelligence, and personality traits among podiatric medical students: A cross-sectional study. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2016;29(3):186–194. https://doi.org/10.4103/1357-6....
25.
Park KH, Roh H, Suh DH, Hojat M. Empathy in Korean medical students: Findings from a nationwide survey. Med Teach. 2015;37(10):943-948. https://doi.org/10.3109/014215....
26.
Kanchan T, Krishan K, Dehal N. Quality of medical education: Is our health in safe hands? Indian J Med Ethics. 2018;3(3):259. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.....
27.
Park KH, Kim DH, Kim SK, et al. The relationships between empathy, stress and social support among medical students. Int J Med Educ. 2015;6:103–108. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5....
28.
Guilera T, Batalla I, Forne C, Soler-Gonzalez J. Empathy and big five personality model in medical students and its relationship to gender and specialty preference: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909....
29.
Haque M, Sa B, Majumder MAA, et al. Empathy among undergraduate medical students: A cross-sectional study in one Malaysian public medical school. Ann Afr Med. 2018;17(4):183–188. https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aa....
30.
Yun JY, Kim KH, Joo GJ, Kim BN, Roh MS, Shin MS. Changing characteristics of the empathic communication network after empathy-enhancement program for medical students. Sci Rep. 2018;8:15092. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598....
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.