RESEARCH PAPER
Unintentional doping: What do athletes know about it?
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Chronic Diseases and Civilization-related Hazards, Faculty of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
2
Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Submission date: 2024-11-20
Final revision date: 2024-12-12
Acceptance date: 2024-12-16
Online publication date: 2025-06-03
Corresponding author
Marta Buczkowska
Department of Chronic Diseases and Civilization-related Hazards,
Faculty of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Piekarska 18, 41-902 Bytom, Poland
Pol. Ann. Med. 2025;32(1):43-52
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The issue of doping remains a significant challenge in the realm of sports, undermining the fundamental principles of fair competition and prompting extensive countermeasures at the organisational level. Unintentional violations of anti-doping regulations have emerged as a growing concern, often arising from a lack of awareness or inadvertent exposure to prohibited substances.
Aim:
The aim of the study was to evaluate the knowledge of athletes about unintentional doping and identify the factors that influence their level of knowledge.
Material and methods:
The survey was questionnaire-based (questionnaire tested for readability and comprehension). The study involved 384 adult athletes, including students of the Academies of Physical Education in Poland and individuals connected to online sports forums. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statitica 13.3 software (α = 0.05).
Results and discussion:
The results obtained by the respondents in the knowledge test conducted in this study indicate that those with sufficient (n = 174; 45.3%) and insufficient knowledge (n = 149; 38.8%) dominated among the surveyed individuals. Athletes with a medical or health science background were approximately 6.5 times more likely to test positive than those without such a background, and athletes at the national or international level were almost 3 times more likely to test positive than recreational athletes.
Conclusions:
There is a relationship between athletes’ level of awareness regarding unintentional doping and their education and status in the sport. The findings may prove beneficial in the development of more effective doping education programs.
FUNDING
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
REFERENCES (41)
2.
PADA. Spectacular Investigations, Intensive Controls, and a Record Number of Anti-Doping Training Sessions. POLADA Summarizes 2022 [in Polish].
https://antydoping.pl/spektaku.... Published 2023. Accessed: February 29, 2024.
7.
Walpurgis K, Thomas A, Geyer H, Mareck U, Thevis M. Dietary Supplement and Food Contaminations and Their Implications for Doping Controls. Foods. 2020;9(8):1012.
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9....
9.
Close GL, Kasper AM, Walsh NP, Maughan RJ. ‘Food First but Not Always Food Only’: Recommendations for Using Dietary Supplements in Sport. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2022;32(5):371–386.
https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem....
10.
Outram S, Stewart B. Doping Through Supplement Use: A Review of the Available Empirical Data. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2015;25(1):54–59.
https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem....
11.
Duiven E, van Loon LJC, Spruijt L, Koert W, de Hon OM. Undeclared doping substances are highly prevalent in commercial sports nutrition supplements. J Sports Sci Med. 2021;20(2):328–338.
https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.....
12.
Gabriels G, Lambert M, Smith P, Wiesner L, Coopoo Y. Fluoxetine contamination in Dietary/Nutritional Supplements (un)bridges the quality of life for the youth to the elderly consumer. Med Res Arch. 2018;6(2).
https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v....
13.
Lee JH, Han JH, Min AY, Kim H, Shin D. Screening for twenty-eight target anabolic-androgenic steroids in protein supplements using QuEChERS extraction followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2020;37(9):1425–1436.
https://doi.org/10.1080/194400....
14.
Wierzejska RE. Dietary Supplements – For Whom? The Current State of Knowledge about the Health Effects of Selected Supplement Use. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(17):8897.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
15.
Australian Institute of Sport. Sports Food and Supplements Guidelines Policy Template for Sport.
https://www.ais.gov.au/__data/.... Published 2022. Accessed: March 5, 2024.
16.
Manonelles P, Aynés OA, López-Plaza D, et al. Accidental doping. Prevention strategies. Arch Med Deporte. 2020;37(1):44–51.
18.
Mazzeo F, Altavilla G, D’Elia F, Raiola G. Development of Doping in sports: overview and analysis. J Physical Education Sport. 2018;18(3):1669–1677.
https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2....
19.
McCartney D, Benson MJ, Desbrow B, Irwin C, Suraev A, McGregor IS. Cannabidiol and Sports Performance: a Narrative Review of Relevant Evidence and Recommendations for Future Research. Sports Med Open. 2020;6(1):27.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798....
20.
Gheorghiev MD, Hosseini F, Moran J, Cooper CE. Effects of pseudoephedrine on parameters affecting exercise performance: a meta-analysis. Sports Med Open. 2018;4(1):44.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798....
21.
Jędrejko K, Lazur J, Muszyńska B. Risk Associated with the Use of Selected Ingredients in Food Supplements. Chem Biodivers. 2021;18(2):e2000686.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.2....
26.
Morente-Sánchez J, Zandonai T, Zabala Díaz M. Attitudes, beliefs and knowledge related to doping in different categories of football players. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(9):981–986.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsam....
27.
Ozkan O, Torgutalp SS, Kara OS, et al. Doping knowledge and attitudes of turkish athletes: A cross-sectional study. Monten J Sports Sci Med. 2020;9(1):49–55.
https://doi.org/10.26773/mjssm....
28.
Orr R, Grassmayr M, Macniven R, Grunseit A, Halaki M, Bauman A. Australian athletes’ knowledge of the WADA Prohibited Substances List and performance enhancing substances. Intl J Drug Pol. 2018;56:40–45.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drug....
29.
Chan DKC, Donovan RJ, Lentillon-Kaestner V, et al. Young athletes’ awareness and monitoring of anti-doping in daily life: Does motivation matter? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(6):e655-e663.
https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12....
30.
Murofushi Y, Kawata Y, Yamaguchi S, Nakamura M, Takazawa Y, Naito H. Relationship between the level of willingness to learn about anti-doping and objective knowledge among Japanese university athletes: A cross-sectional study. Front Sports Act Living. 2022;4:955636.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.....
31.
Murofushi Y, Kawata Y, Nakamura M, et al. Assessing the need to use sport supplements: The mediating role of sports supplement beliefs. Perform Enhanc Health. 2024;12(1):100269.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.....
32.
Voravuth N, Chua EW, Tuan Mahmood TM, et al. Engaging community pharmacists to eliminate inadvertent doping in sports: A study of their knowledge on doping. Aslam MS, ed. PLoS One. 2022;17(6):e0268878.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
33.
The European Parliament and of the Council. Directive 2002/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 June 2002 on the Approximation of the Laws of the Member States Relating to Food Supplements. Official Journal L 183; 12/07/2002:0051–0057.
37.
Sipavičiūtė B, Šukys S, Dumčienė A. Doping prevention in sport: Overview of anti-doping education programmes. Balt J Sport Health Sci. 2020;2(117).
https://doi.org/10.33607/bjshs....
38.
Deng Z, Guo J, Wang D, Huang T, Chen Z. Effectiveness of the world anti-doping agency’s e-learning programme for anti-doping education on knowledge of, explicit and implicit attitudes towards, and likelihood of doping among Chinese college athletes and non-athletes. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022;17(1):31.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011....
39.
Heuberger JAAC, Henning A, Cohen AF, Kayser B. Dealing with doping. A plea for better science, governance and education. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022;88(2):566–578.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14....
40.
Barkoukis V, Mallia L, Lazuras L, et al. The role of comprehensive education in anti-doping policy legitimacy and support among clean athletes. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2022;60:102173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyc....