RESEARCH PAPER
Utility of the surgical Apgar score in predicting morbidity and mortality: A prospective study
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Surgery, M S Ramaiah Medical College, Rajiv Gandhi University of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Harsha Huliyappa   

Department of Surgery, M S Ramaiah Medical College, Rajiv Gandhi University of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. Tel: +91 9450389205. E-mail address: harsha_huliyappa@yahoo.com
Submission date: 2021-02-18
Final revision date: 2021-05-17
Acceptance date: 2021-05-17
Online publication date: 2022-02-25
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Optimization of postoperative care is often contingent upon the risk stratification tools such as surgical scores that are used to prognosticate potential complications.

Aim:
This study evaluates the utility of surgical Apgar score (SAS) as a tool to predict morbidity and 30-day mortality among patients post general surgical procedures.

Material and methods:
The study cohort comprised of 400 patients aged between 15 to 75 years, and prospectively undergoing emergency or elective general surgery. SAS of patients were extracted from the anesthesiologist’s records on estimated blood loss, lowest heart rate and lowest mean arterial pressure. Post-operative outcomes such as major complications and mortality within 30 days of surgery were monitored.

Results and Discussion:
Out of the 297 elective procedures, 22 (7.41%) cases had major complications. While among those undergoing emergency surgeries (103), 38 (36.86%) patients developed major complications. The odds of developing major complications in patients with the high-risk SAS scores (31; 51.67%) was 5.42 (CI: 3.03–9.70) times greater than in patients with low-risk SAS scores (29; 48.33%). The odds of expiring after a general surgery was 11.92 times higher in high-risk patients (9; 75%) when contrasted with low-risk patients (3; 25%). The sensitivity and specificity of SAS in predicting major complications is 51.67% and 83.53%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SAS in predicting mortality are 75% and 79.9%, respectively.

Conclusions:
SAS serves as a simple and dependable tool to predict morbidity and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing surgical procedures under anesthesia other than local, requiring intensive perioperative monitoring.

FUNDING
None.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.
 
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Urrutia J, Valdes M, Zamora T, Canessa V, Briceno J. Can the surgical Apgar score predict morbidity and mortality in general orthopaedic surgery?. Int Orthop. 2012;36(12):2571–2576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264....
 
2.
Kenig J, Mastalerz K, Lukasiewicz K, Mitus-Kenig M, Skorus U. The surgical Apgar score predicts outcomes of emergency abdominal surgeries both in fit and frail older patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;76:54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arch....
 
3.
Rajgopal V, Kulkarni SV. Efficacy of the surgical Apgar score in predicting post-operative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing laparotomy. Int Surg J 2019;6(8):2791–2796. https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/23....
 
4.
Thorn CC, Chan M, Sinha N, Harrison RA. Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in a district general hospital. World J Surg. 2012;36(5):1066–1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268....
 
5.
Gawande AA, Kwaan MR, Regenbogen SE, et al. An Apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(2):201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamc....
 
6.
Ngarambe C, Smart BJ, Nagarajan N, Rickard J. Validation of the surgical Apgar score after laparotomy at a tertiary referral hospital in Rwanda. World J Surg. 2017;41(7):1734–1742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268....
 
7.
Reynolds PQ, Sanders NW, Schildcrout JS, Mercaldo ND, St Jacques PJ. Expansion of the surgical Apgar score across all surgical subspecialties as a means to predict postoperative mortality. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(6):1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b....
 
8.
Arvidsson S, Ouchterlony J, Sjostedt L, Svardsudd K. Predicting postoperative adverse events: clinical efficiency of four general classification systems: the project perioperative risk. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996;40(7):783–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399....
 
9.
Haddow JB, Adwan H, Clark SE, et al. Use of the surgical Apgar score to guide postoperative care. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96(5):352–358. https://dx.doi.org/10.1308%2F0....
 
10.
Wied C, Foss NB, Kristensen MT, Holm G, Kallemose T, Troelsen A. Surgical apgar score predicts early complication in transfemoral amputees: Retrospective study of 170 major amputations. World J Orthop. 2016;7(12):832–838. https://dx.doi.org/10.5312%2Fw....
 
11.
McCullough TC, Roth JV, Ginsberg PC, Harkaway RC. Estimated blood loss underestimates calculated blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2004;72(1):13–16. https://doi.org/10.1159/000075....
 
12.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla....
 
13.
Regenbogen SE, Bordeianou L, Hutter MM, Gawande AA. The intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score predicts postdischarge complications after colon and rectal resection. Surgery. 2010;148(3):559–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg....
 
14.
Regenbogen SE, Ehrenfeld JM, Lipsitz SR, Greenberg CC, Hutter MM, Gawande AA. Utility of the surgical apgar score: validation in 4119 patients. Arch Surg. 2009;144(1):30–37. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsu....
 
15.
Pinho S, Lagarto F, Gomes B, Costa L, Nunes CS, Oliveira C. CR-POSSUM and surgical Apgar score as predictive factors for patients’ allocation after colorectal surgery [in Portuguese]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2018;68(4):351–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan....
 
16.
Ohlsson H, Winsö O. Assessment of the Surgical Apgar Score in a Swedish setting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55(5):524–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399....
 
17.
Sobol JB, Gershengorn HB, Wunsch H, Li G. The Surgical Apgar Score Is Strongly Associated with Intensive Care Unit Admission After High-Risk Intraabdominal Surgery. Anesth. Analg. 2013;117(2):438–446. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b....